| Tamron 11-18mm Review |
|
| Saturday, 16 July 2005 | |
|
The local photographic community recently has been comparing the ultra-wide angle lens for digital SLRs. At press time, the following third-party lens are available in the market: - Tamron 11-18mm f4.5-5.6 - Tokina 12-24mm f4 - Sigma 12-24mm f4.5/5.6 - Sigma 10-20mm f4/5.6 Bob Atkins provided an overview of these various lenses and the prices here . (It's interesting to note that in US, the Tokina is priced cheaper than Tamron, while in Singapore the reverse is true). Lots of user forums have commented about the Sigma 12-24mm (the oldest lens among the 4 in the market) and the Tokina. Even the to-be-released 10-20mm receives lots of buzz among the community. However, very little is mentioned about 11-18mm - no kudos, no brickbats. Here, I shall provide a simple review.
The Tamron 11-18mm is a light-weight lens - too light for some people. It's made of plastic with rubber linings along the zoom ring and focusing ring. In Singapore, this is the lowest-priced lens among the rest of the ultra-wide lens.
If you were to compare this ultra-wide lens with the rest in the market, I would tend to believe that the Nikon/Canon lens quality is much better, but on the other hand, it's too pricey. The Tokina 12-24mm also got good reviews, but price is currently above S$1000. And since Tamron is cheaper and gives wider coverage than Tokina, I believe it's a better buy. Personally, I don't need the extra zoom range, because I believe that a lens that covers too much zoom range may not have consistently good optics anyway. Consider: why does Tamron restrict to 11-18mm range when they could try to increase the range more? Probably because they feel it will undermine the quality. Anyway, I have enough lens to cover me from 11mm to 300mm, what more can I ask for!!? Generally-speaking, Tamron is a no-frills lens. No silent focusing motor, no fast or internal focusing mechanism, and plastic build. But ask yourself: what is the purpose of the lens? If it's for business, then you should invest in a good lens that you want to last for years to come. If it's a hobby, then there is no point paying a premium when you can get similar quality at a low price. That $100-plus savings could get you 1-2 more lens, mind you.
Before I sign-off, I'll summarise the advantages of the Tamron lens: |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|






