www.mamboteam.com
portal.Chester.SG Advertisement
Home arrow Articles arrow Photography arrow Tamron 11-18mm Review
Tuesday, 09 February 2010
 
 
Main Menu
Home
Articles
Flickr Gallery
Photo Gallery
Web Links
Guestbook
Search
Contact Us
Photography
Photo Gallery
Wedding Photography
Photobook - Portraits
Flickr Gallery
Music Albums
Timeless
Piano Spa
Web Links
Music
Photography
Technology
Others
Who's Online
We have 2 guests online
Flickr Tags
angmokio baby ballet beach beauty bed bikini buffet canon children chingay classical cosmetic d200 d300 d70 dance f31fd female food g9 hair jinbei madeleine makeup mayenne mobile model nikki nikon outdoor p1i p2 phone photobook photostory portrait portraits product radgrade8 rapellez rl630 robertsonquay royalacademyofdance samsung sand sb800 sea sentosa sonyericsson strobe strobist sun violin wedding
Tamron 11-18mm Review E-mail
Saturday, 16 July 2005
The local photographic community recently has been comparing the ultra-wide angle lens for digital SLRs. At press time, the following third-party lens are available in the market:
- Tamron 11-18mm f4.5-5.6
- Tokina 12-24mm f4
- Sigma 12-24mm f4.5/5.6
- Sigma 10-20mm f4/5.6

Bob Atkins provided an overview of these various lenses and the prices here . (It's interesting to note that in US, the Tokina is priced cheaper than Tamron, while in Singapore the reverse is true). Lots of user forums have commented about the Sigma 12-24mm (the oldest lens among the 4 in the market) and the Tokina. Even the to-be-released 10-20mm receives lots of buzz among the community. However, very little is mentioned about 11-18mm - no kudos, no brickbats. Here, I shall provide a simple review.

Here are some of the things that people usually ask when getting a third-party lens, and so I shall cover these points:
1) Specifications - Weight, Price
2) Optic quality
3) Focusing speed
4) Comparison with original manufacturer's lens

The Tamron 11-18mm is a light-weight lens - too light for some people. It's made of plastic with rubber linings along the zoom ring and focusing ring. In Singapore, this is the lowest-priced lens among the rest of the ultra-wide lens. 

In terms of optic quality, my eyes tell me that it is considerably good. The colours are rich and sharp, but exhibit slight fringing and distortion at the sides when viewed 100%. I believe this problem exists for all ultrawide and fish-eye lens. I am satisfied with the optic quality although the sides seemed soft and slight fringing when viewed at 100% (nowhere near Sony F828). The truth is: if you do regular full-size prints, you are probably a professional and therefore would not even consider this lens. For the rest of us, the effects are unnoticeable, especially after you resize for web view.

Also, bear in mind that ultra-wide lens will inevitably exhibit distortion depending o­n how you frame the subject. In the shot of the stairs (above), notice that there is virtually no distortion, while the building photo (right), distortion is apparent. Rule of thumb is: objects will be less distortion at horizontal eye-level. If you tilt the camera higher or lower, objects will be distorted. Here's an example of a low-perspective shot of the road (below).

For a scientific optic test result, I refer you to Bob Atkin's review here.

My first impression when I tried o­n the Tamron lens is: the focusing mechanism is slow and noisy! But focus is accurate even in low lighting, and I never did notice the noise when actually using it. Even the focusing speed did not hinder me when taking shots. The o­nly gripe is that the focusing ring rotates when focusing, so I had to be careful when I hold the lens. Due to the short length, I tend to rest my fingers o­n the focusing ring instead of the zoom ring. 


If you were to compare this ultra-wide lens with the rest in the market, I would tend to believe that the Nikon/Canon lens quality is much better, but o­n the other hand, it's too pricey. The Tokina 12-24mm also got good reviews, but price is currently above S$1000. And since Tamron is cheaper and gives wider coverage than Tokina, I believe it's a better buy. Personally, I don't need the extra zoom range, because I believe that a lens that covers too much zoom range may not have consistently good optics anyway. Consider: why does Tamron restrict to 11-18mm range when they could try to increase the range more? Probably because they feel it will undermine the quality. Anyway, I have enough lens to cover me from 11mm to 300mm, what more can I ask for!!?

Generally-speaking, Tamron is a no-frills lens. No silent focusing motor, no fast or internal focusing mechanism, and plastic build. But ask yourself: what is the purpose of the lens? If it's for business, then you should invest in a good lens that you want to last for years to come. If it's a hobby, then there is no point paying a premium when you can get similar quality at a low price. That $100-plus savings could get you 1-2 more lens, mind you. 

At lot of times, we compare too much. True, some lens produces sharper images out of the camera, but you will o­nly see the difference if you do large prints. For myself, I usually resize the pics for web, sharpen it, and it looks great! And to make you feel better: it's the photographer, not the equipment, that great shots are made.

Before I sign-off, I'll summarise the advantages of the Tamron lens:
1) light-weight
2) sub-S$900 - lowest priced ultrawide zoom lens in Singapore (as at June 2005)
3) very wide coverage at 11mm
4) above-average image quality
5) lens hood included
6) 3-year warranty (1-year international, next 2 years local)

For more test photos taken with the Tamron 11-18mm lens, visit here

 
< Prev   Next >
Related Items
 
Top! Top!